Skip to main content
Beantwoord

Can't open port 80 and 443 on Experia Box V10 (ZTE H369A)

  • 13 januari 2022
  • 10 reacties
  • 1033 keer bekeken

AndreScala
Deelnemer

Hi everyone,

I have the ZTE H369A modem/router and I’m not able to open port 80 and 443.

 

To add some context, I have a UDM Pro (the only thing connected to the modem) and I have a Proxmox server running Docker. In Docker I have NGINX and I need to open port 80 and 443 to NGINX be able to get the SSL certificates.

 

So,

  • I tried to open in the modem my UDM Pro IP to the ports (didn’t work)
Toon inhoud

 

  • Then I tried to add my public IP and open also the ports and didn’t work
  • In the UDM Pro I tried to open the ports and nothing
  • I also have DHCP Binding
  • Toon inhoud

     

     

Everytime I try to check with portchecker or CanYouSeeMe they are always closed!

I’m trying this for weeks!
I hope that are somewere there a kind person that can help me :innocent:

Kind regards,
Scala

Beste antwoord door NHendriks

AndreScala schreef:

I don’t know!
The service is provided by Budget and I call them and they redirect me to this forum.

So probably what I’ll do when the contract ends will be change to KPN 1GB connection because is kinda ridicalous when the company were you are paying says that they can´t do nothing about it!! :thinking::rolling_eyes:

That's indeed kind of weird. The V10 of Budget also runs on a different firmware than a KPN V10 does.

 

And about the DMZ, in my opinion, setting the UDM as DMZ is fine, all incoming traffic will be redirected to the UDM and have no other way of reaching other devices. The UDM has a decent built in firewall so it should be fine. I am using the same set-up but with a KPN V10 and a TP Link TL-ER605. I like the DMZ for dual-NAT setups so I don't have to open the ports twice. 

Maybe the port forwarding is not working properly because 80 and 443 are already defined as app in the V10 but I'm not sure. Have you tried the built in apps of the V10?

Bekijk origineel
Dit topic is gesloten. Staat je antwoord hier niet bij, gebruik dan de zoekfunctie van de Community of stel je vraag in een nieuw topic.

10 reacties

Rutger van KPN
Slimmerik
Forum|alt.badge.img+15
  • Oud Moderator
  • 6908 reacties
  • 18 januari 2022

@AndreScala Welcome to our forum. 

I am afraid my knowledge about these products is not good enough. 

Maybe other forum users know what to do, for example @Babylonia:innocent:


Forum|alt.badge.img+10
  • Wijsgeer
  • 3367 reacties
  • 18 januari 2022

First option is to give a fixed IP address by “DHCP Reservation".
Already done as by screenshot.

Next step is to add port forwarding rules 80 and 443 to that given IP address.

There is a complete list already from many regular used services to choose from
by  "Application Configuration".   Also   HTTP (80)   and   HTTPS (443)   are within that list.

Within the top of the menu, you must add the device (with the fixed IP address) + the two rules
HTTP and HTTPS.

Several screen shots can be found about halfway within the first message as of following subject:

 

Geef een apparaat een vast IP (DHCP Binding)

Klik op het tabblad "Instellingen"

 

Poorten openen op de Experia Box (IPv4)

In dit voorbeeld gaan we er van uit

 

For better understanding  < translated by Google >

More or less the same explenation but only as for DHCP reservation + port forwarding:
https://www.synology-forum.nl/the-lounge/kpn-v10-modem-geen-portforwarding-mogelijk-onder-ipv4/msg225219/#msg225219

Keep in mind that today firmware the list of the "Application Configuration" is simplified.
Just one data list to choose from, no separate sections by kind of service.
 

(Apologise for simple explanation, as I have not connected the V10 under normal circumstances.
I do use my own router device, and can not switch back to the V10 now, as several people are using my connection and do use several services).


AndreScala
Deelnemer
  • Auteur
  • Deelnemer
  • 6 reacties
  • 19 januari 2022

@Rutger_  @Babylonia 

Thank you for your help.
I took a little drastic measure and set the DMZ to my UDM Pro machine.

So, no  more problems but I’m feeling a little exposed :sweat_smile:

They should allow us to  ‘ignore’ the router and pass through directly like those that use Fritz!box.

Anyways, it’s working now :)

 

Thanks


Forum|alt.badge.img+6
  • Slimmerik
  • 462 reacties
  • 19 januari 2022

I did the same procedure last week, and the Experia box V10 did what is expected, both for IPv4 and IPv6. Important is that the system connected to the Experia box get’s its IP address via DHCP  fixed with DHCP binding. Do you have access to the NGinx proxied server from the local LAN?  Are there no firewall rules in place somewhere blocking addresses outside the 192.168.2.0/24 range?  


Forum|alt.badge.img+10
  • Wijsgeer
  • 3367 reacties
  • 19 januari 2022
AndreScala schreef:

I took a little drastic measure and set the DMZ to my UDM Pro machine.

So, no  more problems but I’m feeling a little exposed :sweat_smile:

Well, such kind of drastic measure of DMZ maybe can solve your problem of set-up "port forwarding” in the proper way. It also involves a massive security problem, by opening “all" ports to this device.

If you love hackers and malware players into your environment, this is the right way to go.


Forum|alt.badge.img+6
  • Slimmerik
  • 462 reacties
  • 20 januari 2022

Since DMZ to a machine is equivalent to opening ALL ports to that machine, I would expect that opening 80 and 443 should be sufficient. There is no need to redefine port 80/443, because HTTP and HTTPS are standard apps in the firmware, and with IPv4 a port can only be forwarded once.  The only thing which worries me: HTTP is defined as port 80 + 443. But opening only HTTP keeps HTTPS closed. Opening standard HTTP + standard HTTPS works. This looks like a problem in the firmware (???)

Since incoming packets contain as source the remote  IP address and as destination the local client address. it makes no sense to do something in UDM  firewall rules with V10  internal or external address.

 

 


AndreScala
Deelnemer
  • Auteur
  • Deelnemer
  • 6 reacties
  • 20 januari 2022

I don’t know!
The service is provided by Budget and I call them and they redirect me to this forum.

So probably what I’ll do when the contract ends will be change to KPN 1GB connection because is kinda ridicalous when the company were you are paying says that they can´t do nothing about it!! :thinking::rolling_eyes:


NHendriks
Superuser
Forum|alt.badge.img+11
  • Superuser
  • 2980 reacties
  • Antwoord
  • 20 januari 2022
AndreScala schreef:

I don’t know!
The service is provided by Budget and I call them and they redirect me to this forum.

So probably what I’ll do when the contract ends will be change to KPN 1GB connection because is kinda ridicalous when the company were you are paying says that they can´t do nothing about it!! :thinking::rolling_eyes:

That's indeed kind of weird. The V10 of Budget also runs on a different firmware than a KPN V10 does.

 

And about the DMZ, in my opinion, setting the UDM as DMZ is fine, all incoming traffic will be redirected to the UDM and have no other way of reaching other devices. The UDM has a decent built in firewall so it should be fine. I am using the same set-up but with a KPN V10 and a TP Link TL-ER605. I like the DMZ for dual-NAT setups so I don't have to open the ports twice. 

Maybe the port forwarding is not working properly because 80 and 443 are already defined as app in the V10 but I'm not sure. Have you tried the built in apps of the V10?


AndreScala
Deelnemer
  • Auteur
  • Deelnemer
  • 6 reacties
  • 20 januari 2022

Ok then, I’ll keep with DMZ.
 

Thanks for the support.

:thumbsup:


Forum|alt.badge.img+6
  • Slimmerik
  • 462 reacties
  • 20 januari 2022

OK, that explains the “App group” radiobuttons in the screenshot. I’ve never seen this in KPNs V10 version. If the UDM has a decent type of firewall blocking everything except…..,  DMZ should not harm.